Summary Capsule
Mutant Meter
Movie Store [proceeds go toward monthly MRFH upkeep]
Actually, here’s a nifty barometer for Land of the Dead: if you think it is (1) clever; and (2) interesting in a meta-argumentative manner for Romero to heavily play the money-as-power card and run into the ground the fact that powerful people with money are bad and poor people with dreams are good, then it might be “fun” and “rewarding” for you to sit through this movie. If you’re psyched for it, don’t worry about those being the only issues that get touched upon. Terrorism, racism, and sexism get touched upon as well. How there’s any time for zombie action among all this, I’ll never know. I really hate having to come down on a film that appears to be genuinely interested in melding horror with social issues in an intelligent way, but I took offense, and still do, at the film contorting itself in an annoying way to attempt to get the best of both worlds. As is usually the case, it failed at achieving either in a believable or interesting way. Money is certainly the root of all this trouble. Not in execution, though. The film looks great, the effects are pretty good, and the zombies are just what I wanted. But story-wise, the inclusion of money is taken to absurd extremes and had me staring in disbelief at a film that tried to make me buy into characters being motivated by piles and piles of cash, despite the fact that the world has apparently been reduced to occasional outposts, and logically the only real use for paper money at that point would be as kindling and rough toilet paper. Maybe I missed the dialogue that talked about another place in the world of this film that still took Mastercard and Traveler’s Checks, but otherwise I couldn’t help but thinking that money wouldn’t buy much more than cheap laughs and “Are you kidding? I said pay in bullets” glares from bartenders and stuff. Meanwhile, here’s another problem I had with Cholo needing money from Hopper: Cholo is part of a roving gang that travels around the zombie-infested countryside looking for supplies and whatnot to bring back to Fiddler’s Green for everybody. If money still has value at this point like it did pre-zombies (and the way Cholo demands $5 million, it certainly seems to), why not rob every cash register and ATM that can be found? The way bullets and missiles get tossed around, it really shouldn’t be too much trouble for Cholo and a group of lackeys to clear out enough zombies to be able to safely crack a bank vault somewhere and clear out a nice retirement fund. Instead, it seems like Hopper controls all the money in the world, which begs the question of where Cholo plans to bring his ill-gotten funds and what he thinks he can do with it. We’re supposed to hate Hopper because he’s the rascist guy with all the money, view Cholo distastefully because he’s all about money and he’s willing to commit terrorist acts to get what he feels he deserves, and think of Simon Baker as the hero because he cares about the lives of all innocent living people and he just wants to get away from it all and make it to Canada where there are either less zombies or ones easier to kill. Personally, I thought of Baker as the hero just because he has the common sense to be paid in guns, ammo, and a car. There are other strange quirks that were vastly more fun to consider than paying full attention to the film. All the people living in luxury in Fiddler’s Green, wearing suits and expensive dresses and buying expensive items and whatnot: how are they supporting themselves? Are they just living off of the money they accumulated in the pre-zombie world? What sort of white collar jobs could there be in a post-zombies world, even if we’re talking about the sheltered bubble of Fiddler’s Green? When zombies attack, a lot of the “businessmen” run off holding a loved one’s hand in one fist and a briefcase in the other. What’s so important that it’s worth taking with you when almost certain death is upon you? Why didn’t anyone ever consider the benefit of an escape plan being devised, even a rudimentary one? If zombies are pretty much earthbound and confined to walking/shambling attacks, why would Hopper’s (presumably) secret method of escape involve going to an underground parking garage, necessitating a long drive to street level and then another drive to wherever his boat was docked? There are a lot more questions than satisfactory answers in Land of the Dead. I can’t help but think that if the hugely clunky plot device of money had been completely removed from the equation, the film would have been much more real and devastating. Instead, we get the usual stuff: rich people are racist and selfish, poor/working people are downtrodden yet strong, zombies attack all that lives. I just don’t think short bursts of zombie action, even courtesy of horror maestro Romero, is worth the hassle of sitting through nonsensical plot devices, even if under the guise of “social commentary.” The gore, including a zombie’s graphic removal of a woman’s belly button piercing, may be offensive to your personal sense of safety, but the story is offensive to your intelligence. Stick with either Dawn of the Dead or 28 Days Later (yes, I know they’re not zombies) for modern zombie horror needs.
"What, zombies don’t roar? What about meow? Cluck? Chitter? Growl? Okay, growl. I can do growl. Grrrrr… owl. Guess I’ll work on that later.
"I had no idea who that was. "He explained that he made a couple really famous zombie documentaries back in the day, and supposedly was the granddaddy of the genre. I couldn’t quite tell him, growling in Morse code, that the area of my brain that gave a crap to such old distinctions had dribbled from my nose the week previous. This aging cowboy said he wanted to go for one last ride, one final hurrah in the same field in which he entered the movie world. One more zombie flick, for good measure. "Yeah, well, yours truly has never been that photogenic — and I’m sensitive enough about it, thank you very much — to want to be in a feature, but this human offered me at least three chained-up teenage delinquents as pay. Food’s food, my pappy always said, right before he ate my ma. "So that’s how I got to be an undead extra on Land of the Dead, trotting slowly down the same path of my ancestors. Wobbling toward the living. Bumping awkwardly into doors and small park benches. Having various limbs shot off painfully, then reattached with movie duct tape, only to be plugged again. Biting into and feasting on nasty-tasting special effects gore that looked quite red but tasted like flowers. Being yet again the butt of every joke in the monster world. It’s not a living, it’s a stinking travesty. "Oh, Romero promised all sorts of perks and original twists and scathing social satire using us undead fodder as a blunt, scabby tool. But we knew better — that in a world full of new-school zombie marathon running and video game-to-movie adaptations, we ‘traditional’ zombiekin are nothing more than archaic has-been’s, meekly doing whatever we’re told for one last laugh instead of one last scream. "It didn’t really help matters that Romero wanted to portray a new type of Thinking Zombie, something on par with a dim-witted ape, because he didn’t go far enough. How could we not be embarrassed, when the director orders us to clumsily use tools and pump gas when most of us have post-graduate degrees and work in the science sector? If we’re going to be intelligent, then George there needed to jack up the I.Q. above ‘pre-school’ to keep the audiences snickering at our ineptitude. "Fine, whatever. See the movie, if you’re an ‘of the Dead’ series fan, or if you’re a zombie completeist and need to see every corpse-fest that comes out. But don’t say I didn’t warn you — United Zombie Association #143 doesn’t support this type of mediocrity, and we never will."
Is It Worth Staying Through End Credits?
Intermission! [some sources: IMDb]
This is the fourth film in George Romero's zombie series which Romero says it takes place after Night of the Living Dead with no specific time frame. The last zombie film he wrote and directed was Day of the Dead (1985) which was released twenty years ago. 'George A. Romero' intended to make this film in his home town Pittsburgh - the story is set there and it's where he made his other zombie films. However his producers insisted on filming Toronto in order to take advantage of Canadian tax incentives. Asia Argento (Slack) is the daughter of noted Italian horror filmmaker Dario Argento, who was the co-producer of one of this film's prequels: Dawn of the Dead (1978). Asia Argento is also SUPER-HOT (Kyle’s opinion) and has awesome tattoos and piercings. Sadly, she is super-wasted in this film. Not as in “wasted on drugs,” that is; she’s just used like she should be. Er, that sounded kind of dirty. See New Rose Hotel or Scarlet Diva if you want to see Argento used... um, properly... oh, man, I’m going to hell . . . Groovy Quotes
Kaufman: In a world where the dead are returning to life, the word "trouble" loses much of its meaning.
Charlie: Nice shooting.
Slack: [talking about Riley] You take care of him, huh?
Pillsbury: [Motown is hotwiring a car] Yellow to red!
Riley: [about the fireworks] Put some flowers in the graveyard.
Kaufman: We do not negotiate with terrorists! If you liked this movie, try these:
This review page was last updated on 7.30.05 MRFH Home . Reviews . Findaflik . Features! . MRFH Forum © 2005 Mutant Reviewers From Hell (Original Content). All Rights Reserved. |